American Classic Pedigrees
  • Home
  • Books
    • American Classic Pedigrees
    • Dream Derby
    • Gold Rush
    • The Kentucky Oaks
    • The Kingmaker
    • Recommended Reading
  • Blogs
    • Mares on Monday
    • Horse Tales
  • Articles
  • Horse Profiles
    • Horse Profiles A-E
    • Horse Profiles F-K
    • Horse Profiles L-Q
    • Horse Profiles R-Z
  • Links
  • About ACP
    • Author
    • For Contributors >
      • Contact

In Process ....

1/15/2026

0 Comments

 
Having just finished the proofs for my new book on Holy Bull, this seems as good a time as any to review the steps it takes to get a book to market through a traditional publisher. If any of you have ideas about writing a real book (and not AI slop), this is the gauntlet you'll run.

1) Get an idea that's worth developing. Honestly, this is the easy part. If anyone out there has the notion of "I've got a great idea! I'll give it to an author, s/he can write the book, and we'll split the proceeds," please don't bother; most authors have more ideas than they can ever write up, and most also know better than to commit themselves to a deal that leaves them doing 99.9 percent of the work for what will probably be very little return. (If you haven't read my August 17, 2023, post, "So You Want to Write a Book," I'd suggest doing so to get some grasp of the work involved and the likely returns.) Besides, if you don't feel passionate enough about your idea to put the work of writing in, why should someone else?

2) Research, research, research. If you are writing nonfiction, this is an absolute necessity. Remember, you're trying to sell to an audience with an interest in your topic, and that audience is going to include some people who aren't going to be fooled by blowing smoke. If you count on AI summaries to do your homework, you deserve what you get. Fiction writers also do more research than you'd think; it's part of creating believable fictional worlds in which suspension of disbelief can operate.

3) Create a manuscript and/or a book proposal. This is where the road forks between fiction and nonfiction writers. Generally, fiction publishers want to see a complete draft accompanying your cover letter and proposal. Nonfiction publishers vary more; some will be content with an outline and synopsis, while others will want to see sample chapters. Find out what the requirements are for the publishing house you are targeting and follow them religiously, especially if you have no prior history of working with that house.

4) Prepare to be hit with a lot of advertising for publishing opportunities once you start marketing your book proposal/manuscript. Most of these will be for self-publishing or vanity presses; some will be outright scams. If you do want to go the self-publishing route, do your due diligence about researching how best to go about it. (While my crystal ball may be no better than anyone else's, I think it not improbable that the current flood of AI-generated books hitting the market may actually lead to a resurgence of more traditional publishing in some form as readers look for books that have actually been written by humans and have passed some sort of quality control prior to going to market.)

4) You've been accepted and you've signed a contract! Congratulations! But now, the grunt-work really begins. If you haven't already come up with and submitted a complete manuscript (including any illustrations called for in the contract), you will have a deadline for doing so. If you have, your next step will be copy editing and revisions. The exact stages will depend on the house you're going through. At my current publisher, the University of Kentucky Press, two or three readers will go over a manuscript first, giving feedback and suggesting areas for improvement. After any revisions have been made, the next step is copy editing. That means a copy editor goes over your work line by line, looking for everything from punctuation errors to unclear writing, and you will need to review and respond to every suggested change (though you need not incorporate every change if you feel you have good reason for standing pat; it's your manuscript, after all). If any major changes need to be made that haven't already been taken care of, this is your last opportunity to make them.

5) Review of the proofs is the last major stage before publication. At this point, you will be looking at your manuscript pretty much as it is going to appear when printed. You should read it over carefully and make sure any typos or mistakes haven't managed to sneak through the earlier editing, but suggesting major revisions now is a good way to have your editor frothing at the mouth. Even if the revisions are accepted as necessary, they will result in the entire manuscript having to be set up anew for printing and may well delay the release date, which will not make the publisher happy.

6) If this is a nonfiction work, you will probably be asked to create an index for your book, making it easier for readers to locate specific information. (If this is going to be done by the publishing house, count yourself lucky; it isn't a difficult task, but it is a bit tedious.) The reason this comes so late in the publication process is that you'll need to be able to link your topics to page numbers as they will appear in the printed book, and those numbers won't be available until the proofs are created. Get the index done on time in order to keep from delaying publication.

7) Your book is born! You will probably receive the author copies specified by your contract two or three weeks before the actual release date, but at this point, the writing work is done ... until the next book.
 
0 Comments

Little Things Mean a Lot

12/11/2025

0 Comments

 
Regardless of the form of writing or its content, delivery means a great deal. For example, the choice of font can set mood and give some information about the writer's mindset before a single word of the content has been grasped. Times New Roman? That might communicate to a traditional book publisher that you're taking submission requirements seriously, which cues the reader that you'd like to have your manuscript taken seriously. But Times New Roman would be too staid for the menu screen of an edgy horror game and not elegant enough for invitations to a black-tie event. Arial (which I use here) is unfussy and easy to read, making it a good choice for easy-to-digest online text content, but it lacks the playfulness one might want to see in a greeting card or the captions of a look-at-the-cute-funny-animals video. The important thing is that the chosen font should complement and further the use to which it is being put, not work at cross-purposes with it. Likewise, color and background schemes furnish cues as to your writing's intended tone and audience, again before there is any conscious comprehension of the actual content.

Another area that can enhance or diminish the effectiveness of your writing is the attention given to grammar, spelling, and punctuation. At the risk of sounding like an old-fashioned schoolmarm, I cannot emphasize enough that sloppiness in these areas hurts you in two ways. First, it communicates a degree of laziness on your part and a corresponding lack of respect for your readers. It is one thing to make the occasional mistake or typo; we all do. It is another when you can't be troubled to clean up your writing and free it of potential distractions---and an egregious misspelling or obvious subject-verb disagreement can be more distracting than you might think. Second, these errors---particularly misplaced punctuation---can make your writing more difficult to understand than it needs to be or even convey a meaning that is not the one you intended. Don't count on an AI resource to bail you out of these sorts of mistakes, either; while AI can be useful for basic proofreading, it tends to be weak regarding words that can have any of a number of meanings depending on context, and AI does not usually handle the fine points of English usage any too well.

Finally, word selection can be critical in conveying shades of meaning, and this is one area where a background in poetry (an area in which I am admittedly no expert) can be of considerable help. Training in poetry helps one to consider not only the exact meaning and imagery one wishes to convey with limited words but also develops an ear for the flow and meter of one's writing even when composing prose. The noted Christian writer C. S. Lewis often read passages from his works aloud as he was writing them in order to assess how his writing might sound to a reader's inner ear, and this is not a bad practice to follow in improving readability.

One caution here: when it comes to word selection, avoid making choices based on whatever the current virtue signaling of the moment is. It will be out of fashion next year, if not next month, and will leave your writing feeling dated, tendentious, or both. Common sense and common courtesy, used together, will get you much further in appealing to as wide an audience as possible without giving unnecessary offense.

Happy writing!


 


0 Comments

On the Trail of Chief Johnson ... and Baba Yaga?

8/21/2025

0 Comments

 
As previously anticipated (see "The Challenge of the Ordinary," May 29, 2025), Sam "Chief" Johnson has not been an easy person to track across the years. I am slowly building quite a profile on him now, thanks to the online Daily Racing Form archives. While these don't provide all the details I might want, the references there do help me pin down where he was active at a given time. Trying to find material on someone with so common a name as "Sam Johnson" in the huge Newspapers.com database is like trying to find particular snowflakes in a blizzard; being able to apply filters as to the cities/regions and times likeliest to yield references to the correct Sam Johnson makes a huge difference. So, I am making progress there.

I also finally got back to writing a little on the Firebird idea last night and am pondering on how best to handle an encounter between the heroine and Baba Yaga. This is challenging because Baba Yaga has plenty of surface familiarity for those even slightly acquainted with Slavic legend and mythology but is a figure with a thousand faces when you go below that surface. I don't want her to be just a stock figure of the Evil Old Witch to be gotten around somehow, like a boss in a video game. At the same time, she has to present a serious challenge for the heroine on a number of levels, one that should draw on the heroine's unique gifts and have a significant impact on her character arc. That means I have to come up with a fresh way of presenting elements that could otherwise fall into one of several pretty tired tropes. Which may force me to grow as a writer as much as the fictional Vasiliya does as a person.
0 Comments

Scene Selection

5/8/2025

0 Comments

 
One of the challenges facing any writer is this: You have developed a scene, and it is really good. It is riveting, solid, and well written. Interesting characters move through it in believable fashion; you can practically see it playing out on screen. There's just one hitch: somehow, it doesn't quite do what you need it to do in the context of the entire manuscript, and you're not sure what to do about it.

Sometimes, painful though it may be, you may need to delete it from the manuscript; a scene that does not advance the story in a satisfying manner cannot be allowed to remain, no matter how excellently it is written. But very often, such drastic surgery isn't necessary. Answering a few basic questions and revising the scene accordingly can heighten its impact and make it a more dynamic part of your completed work.

First, does the scene's beginning pull readers of the previous scene further into the story? At its end, does it push them to move into the next scene? If the answer is "no," or "I don't know," you may want to consider how the events of the previous and subsequent scenes tie into your problem scene. Sometimes you may need to move material between scenes for greater effectiveness; for example, perhaps a bit of exposition regarding the resolution of some conflict or tension in the previous scene needs to be moved back into that scene, letting you jump into the new scene with a growing problem or a piece of action that is a logical development from the previous scene's resolution. Sometimes the ending to your scene needs to leave the reader realizing that while the scene's main conflict has been resolved, another conflict or problem is now rearing its head---not quite a cliffhanger (although that can be a useful device when not overused), but enough to keep the reader moving into finding out how the new area of tension is going to play out. There are exceptions to every rule, but generally, don't begin a scene with a lot of exposition if you can move quickly into action of some sort, and don't end a scene with the feeling that everything has been wrapped up neatly with a bow on it.

Second, does anything grow or change during the scene? Is there development of a character arc? Does the scene drive toward a protagonist's choice that has real stakes attached? Does the world around the character grow in some way, pushing the character to change in response? If nothing happens during the scene that really matters to the overall story, then the scene isn't carrying its weight.

Third, does the scene carry out multiple purposes in the narrative? Ideally, the scene will develop or advance several things at once, whether it's the overall plot, a subplot, a character arc, world development, character relationships, or a theme. If the scene only serves one purpose, that may explain why it isn't meshing well with other scenes weighted more heavily toward other aspects of the story. A scene that works on several areas is less likely to end up seeming flat when considered in the context of the rest of the story.

Fourth, does the scene grow organically from what the story has already revealed? Plot twists and unexpected developments are fine, but they still need to have some logical or emotional continuity with what's already been going on. Throwing in a scene that mostly supplies shock value often leaves readers feeling cheated---as in a detective story, it's not fair to your readers to leave them without any hints of what might be coming down the line. A development that in hindsight gets the reaction, "Now why didn't I see that coming before?" is fine; a narrative sucker punch is not.

Five, is the scene providing value in developing something significant to the overall story, or is it heading off down a rabbit trail, chasing some minor event or character that will have very little influence on your narrative when all is said and done? Minor stuff can add a lot of richness to your story, but don't give it more space than it deserves based on its overall importance. Scenes that are chasing rabbits probably need to be cut, no matter how fine the writing within the scene is.

Now, if your review indicates that drastic surgery is necessary and a scene needs to go, that doesn't mean you should discard it entirely; as many an author has found, such scenes sometimes carry the germ of a whole new work in them, so there's no harm in stashing them in a file somewhere and letting them percolate in the back of your mind. Just make sure that the scenes you do keep are pulling their full weight in moving your story along, and you'll probably be much happier with both your end results and their reception by others.

Happy writing!
0 Comments

On the Move Again!

4/24/2025

0 Comments

 
Having reviewed some YouTube videos and articles on the art of writing, I think I have found a solution (at least one that works for me) to the problem of writer's block with the Firebird. I now have a partial framework laid out in scene-by-scene fashion, along with a summary of what each scene is meant to accomplish. When I get stalled on that, I work on one of the scenes. When inspiration for a scene plays out, I go back to the framework.

I am finding that this has two benefits beyond that of my writing something---anything---to keep moving forward. Having a framework at least partially done prompts me to consider how whatever scene I am currently writing will fit into the overall movement of the story and how it will move plot and characterization forward. In switching over to work on the framework, the developing scenes cause me to consider whether the framework needs revision---a character's arc and growth as explored in a scene may cause me to realize that events need to move in a different order than originally planned to best develop the overall idea and the emerging subplots.

With a half-finished framework and a bunch of undeveloped scenes, I'm still a long way from having a finished manuscript. But at least I'm enjoying myself and making progress again. Don't know if this will help the writers among you, but I hope it's at least worth considering. Happy writing!


0 Comments

Themes

2/27/2025

0 Comments

 
In writing---or attempting to write---fiction, sooner or later the author must wrestle with the themes to be presented. These are the unifying ideas or questions that underlie a story. They may be consciously chosen beforehand; they may develop organically as the writer proceeds, flowing out from the writer's experiences, thinking, and personal wrestlings; or they may follow a middle course in their development.

Themes also emerge in nonfictional writing, particularly history and biography, in which the themes the author chooses to pursue will powerfully influence both which facts and events are more heavily weighted and the author's interpretation of those facts in portions of the narrative in which it is appropriate to present the author's educated guess as to why or how something happened or someone acted as they did. (Whew! That's a mouthful.) The same facts that lead one author to craft a narrative showcasing the theme of perseverance against the odds might lead another author to explore the question of "what is social justice?", resulting in two quite distinct accounts of the same event or person.

Authors, by the way, are under no obligation to answer the questions presented in their themes and are often better when they do not, allowing the reader's mind to grapple with the question and continue exploration of possible answers even after the journey of the book's protagonist has reached a conclusion. A question that leads to a pat answer is more a moral than a theme, and while morals have their place (a la Aesop's Fables), they seldom make for the kind of books that provoke deep thought or become old friends, kept for re-reading and re-exploring.

Because my early concepts of the tale of the Firebird revolve around a tension between two worlds and two modes of existence that the main characters are caught between, the primary theme that seems to be emerging is this: What does it mean to be human? That is a question with so many ramifications and sub-themes that I think I'm in little danger of becoming trite, at least. It's also a question that to some extent makes me glad that I'm not trained as a philosopher, as I'd rather not fall off the other side of the horse into being ponderous or abstruse and so risk losing the story.

More themes may start developing as I proceed, for a book seldom has only a primary theme and nothing else; secondary themes will almost always come out to play as well. But at least I have some idea of which way the river of my thoughts is running.

0 Comments

Pacing

2/13/2025

0 Comments

 
As I continue playing with the Firebird concept, defining the overall pace of the story becomes important. Pacing---the speed at which a story unfolds and progresses---is at once dependent on the type of story being told and yet an element that helps define the story. It is an important factor in setting moods, developing characters, and determining the complexity of the tale. Pacing can be one way in which a book satisfies reader expectations; it can also signal surprises or twists as the pace speeds up or slows down.

While many people think of pacing as primarily important to fiction writing, nonfiction works that recount a narrative of some sort also rely on pacing to convey information and to set tone. For example, I am currently reading a biography of Queen Elizabeth II that is seeking to convey both the personality of the late Queen and the complexity of her role as she navigated the historical and political events of seven decades as a constitutional monarch with great influence but no direct power. By its nature, the intimacy of this written portrait demands a relatively slow, thoughtful overall pace. By way of contrast, T. R., a biography of Teddy Roosevelt written in the mid-20th century, moved at a faster pace reflecting the energy and activity of its subject and his power to influence events directly; while it touched on his personal development as a man and how the development of his character affected his decisions, it was more driven by his direct interaction with the events of his time.

Pacing can shift within a book, often in concert with the development of the primary character. For instance, in my upcoming biography of Holy Bull, the pace is relatively moderate while discussing his early life and the emergence of his distinctive personality, then picks up as he moves into his racing career, slowing once more as he transitions to the life of a stallion. Pacing can also ebb and flow to allow sections with more intensive setting and character development to alternate with passages depicting action and the consequences of crucial decisions; this allows the reader to "take a breath" and not be either overwhelmed by one hard-driving piece of action after another or bored by an overdose of introspection or unneeded detail.

I haven't made all the decisions yet as to how the Firebird story will set up, but as a fantasy centering around the viewpoint of one particular character, a moderate pace with a pattern alternating external and internal activity seems likely to be most workable. I'll probably have to do some outlining and shuffling to see what progression works best.







0 Comments

A Word About Websites

1/9/2025

0 Comments

 
I've spent a good chunk of my free time during the last week updating this website based on the 2024 sire lists---as many as I could get hold of for countries that conduct black-type racing under International Catalogue standards. This brings me to the topic of website development and maintenance, which most authors will have to consider sooner or later.

Now, American Classic Pedigrees is a much larger project than most authors will ever need to undertake. For me, the business of writing about Thoroughbreds and the maintenance of an organized compilation of information about the breed are closely intertwined. For others, simpler may be much better. Nevertheless, given the importance of online presence and platforms in modern book marketing, websites are necessities, not luxuries or "nice-to-haves," and should be carefully designed to accomplish a writer's purposes in providing visibility for his or her work.

Websites do not have to be expensive. If you use a do-it-yourself host that provides pre-made elements and layouts to customize to your needs (as I do), a few hundred dollars a year will cover the basics; the rest depends on how much time you want to pour in and whether you want to hire any of the host's design services to polish things up further. If you want a professionally designed and fully customized site and lack the skills to do the work yourself, you may lay out several thousand for the work, depending on what bells and whistles you want to include, in addition to paying annual fees for hosting and for registration of your domain name.

At a minimum, an author website should meet some basic standards:

1) Is the domain name one that is reasonably easy to remember?

2) Is the site's basic layout attractive? While this is somewhat subjective, designs usually work best when they are uncluttered, focused on a single main theme, and using an easy-to-read font that is fairly high in contrast to the background.

3) Is the site easy to navigate? Do buttons and drop-down menus clearly indicate how content is organized? Are links clearly indicated and functional?

4) Are your most recent works up front? Is it easy to find information about earlier works on the site?

5) Do you have easily accessed space for sharing information with your readers about upcoming projects, appearances, and promotions?

6) Does each book have ordering information clearly shown? If you're not doing direct sales through your site, you do want people to know how to obtain your titles.

7) Does the website translate reasonably well to smartphones? Like it or not, that's a major means of access these days.

8) Does the website help your readers to make a personal connection to you? Whether or not you want them to be able to communicate with you directly is a personal choice, but does the website display something of who you are and what you are about? How about social media information?

I know a lot of this is going to seem pretty old-school to those who are digital natives, but for those of you working on a first book, there's no time like the present to start thinking about how you will present yourself online. And if you already have a website, this is as good a time as any to review it and see if it needs any tweaking to remain up-to-date and focused on your needs in communicating with your audience.

Happy writing!
0 Comments

A Passion for Writing

12/26/2024

3 Comments

 
As I look back over 2024, my writing and the activities connected to it have gone through at least as many ups and downs and unexpected turns as this blog. I can't say I've been terribly consistent, but if you, the reader, have enjoyed sharing some of my journey with me or have gotten some benefit from a book review or a bit of writing advice, then my work has been worthwhile.

I close out the year with a wish that, whatever your writing goals may be, you will pursue them with passion, for good writing comes first and foremost from the heart. What you love, share. It's as simple as that.

Happy writing in 2025!

3 Comments

World Building

12/19/2024

0 Comments

 
Whether writing a fictional story or a nonfictional writing dealing with history or biography, world building is a necessary part of the work. It is not enough to create or present compelling characters. To know them, and to know why they act (or acted) as they do (did), one must understand the context in which they exist(ed)---a context that includes, but is not limited to, the geography, biota, and climate of the setting; culture; social structures; and prevailing philosophies and intellectual trends. These background factors define the probable limitations of a character's worldview, the questions that character may seek to ask or answer, and the range of experiences that the character may have had.

From an author's point of view, constraints on world building exist on a continuum. When writing fantasy, for example, the author has a great deal more creative work to do but also has much more freedom to put together a world according to his or her vision, so long as it is internally self-consistent. The more you slide over toward historical fiction and history, the more you are constrained by what has actually been, and world building for your narrative is more a matter of research and emphasis than of creation.

Some will doubtless disagree with me, but my opinion is that, if you want to write "history as it should have been," you should confine yourself to fiction. This is for two reasons. First, some otherwise fine writing has been utterly spoiled by 20th- or 21st-century Western attitudes, thinking patterns, and cultural elements being inserted into a historical context in which these elements did not exist or at most existed only in embryonic form. (It is true that some historical personages have made some remarkable leaps ahead of their times, some of which anticipated modern conditions, but these leaps did not occur out of vacuums; part of the work of the serious historian is to show from the available evidence how a person's background, experiences, and previous ideas made it possible for that person to make the jump from the prevailing paradigms of his or her time to a new one.) The second reason is that fiction often allows a much freer exploration of ideas in a form that is not so easily forgotten or dismissed. 

Assuming you are writing nonfiction, spending research time on the many elements constituting the background in which your narrative will be set may not seem like much fun, and it certainly adds considerably to the hours you'll spend perusing archives, reference works, and websites. (Writing fiction will not get you out of this entirely, by the way; many top writers of fantasy and science fiction spend a great deal of time researching real-life information that will help them construct believable fictional worlds and cultures.) Nonetheless, there is no subject for doing your homework if you want to capture the flavor of the world in which your subjects were immersed.
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    I'm Avalyn Hunter, an author with a passion for Thoroughbreds and a passion for writing and storytelling.

    Archives

    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023

    Categories

    All
    Amer. Classic Pedigrees
    An Author's Life
    Book Reviews
    Dream Derby
    Famous Horses
    Writing Topics

© 2014-2026 by Avalyn Hunter. All rights reserved. Contributors' materials remain the property of the copyright owners and are used by permission. For information regarding use or licensure of photographs, please contact the copyright holder.

Home     Books     Articles     Horse Profiles    Hoofprints    Contact    Links